Hi Zhuo. Look at the general feedback on the main blog. Detailing is getting a bit too messy and chunky probably due to the sheer scale of your scheme. Siting is v important. Did you do the parallel projections beforehand?
Hi Jacky, thank you for looking. I will decrease the the sheer scale and consider the site. But i am wondering if the cubes and curvilinear intervention are two different languages, because i found them not look so goods when they combine together. And do you think is ok if I don't do much of the internal spaces, and let the spaces of marker all exposure to outside like my model now. ( yes, i did the parallel projections in sketch up first, then draw them while watching the model.)
Hi Zhuo. Look at the general feedback on the main blog. Detailing is getting a bit too messy and chunky probably due to the sheer scale of your scheme. Siting is v important. Did you do the parallel projections beforehand?
ReplyDeleteHi Jacky, thank you for looking. I will decrease the the sheer scale and consider the site. But i am wondering if the cubes and curvilinear intervention are two different languages, because i found them not look so goods when they combine together. And do you think is ok if I don't do much of the internal spaces, and let the spaces of marker all exposure to outside like my model now. ( yes, i did the parallel projections in sketch up first, then draw them while watching the model.)
Delete